The New People’s Army (NPA) has been a prominent force in the Philippines’ socio-political landscape for over five decades. As the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), the NPA has sought to overthrow the government and establish a socialist state, using guerrilla warfare tactics.
This history delves into the origins, growth, challenges, and current status of the NPA, providing a detailed overview of its enduring influence.
Origins and Ideological Foundations
The NPA’s formation on March 29, 1969, marked the beginning of an armed insurgency deeply rooted in the socio-economic conditions of the Philippines. The late 1960s were a time of political unrest and widespread poverty, exacerbated by an inequitable distribution of wealth and resources.
The CPP, established a year prior, found fertile ground for its Marxist-Leninist ideology, which resonated with many who were disillusioned by the existing political system.
The CPP, influenced by Mao Zedong’s revolutionary strategies, believed that a protracted people’s war was necessary to overthrow the government. The NPA was conceived as a means to this end, focusing on guerrilla tactics, land reform, and establishing a base among the rural poor.
The initial cadres of the NPA were small, consisting of a few dozen fighters armed with a handful of weapons. However, their resolve and the grievances they tapped into provided the momentum for growth.
To read about why Nepal failed at communism click here.
Expansion and Early Struggles
In its early years, the NPA concentrated its activities in the northern and central parts of Luzon, the largest island in the Philippines. The group’s strategy involved building a mass base among the peasantry, whom they viewed as the primary force for revolution. The NPA engaged in what they termed “agrarian revolution,” which included redistributing land, reducing rent, and implementing anti-usury measures. These actions were aimed at winning the support of the rural populace.
The declaration of martial law by President Ferdinand Marcos in 1972 was a critical juncture for the NPA. While martial law aimed to suppress communist insurgency and political opposition, it also created a climate of fear and repression. The authoritarian crackdown included mass arrests, censorship, and human rights abuses, which inadvertently increased public sympathy for the NPA and the CPP. As a result, the NPA’s ranks swelled, bolstered by students, intellectuals, and activists who were disillusioned by the Marcos regime.
Peak Influence and Internal Challenges
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, the NPA reached its zenith, with estimates suggesting it had up to 25,000 fighters. The group established guerrilla fronts across many of the Philippines’ islands, effectively challenging the state’s control in various regions. The NPA’s tactics included ambushes, assassinations of political figures, and attacks on infrastructure, which aimed to destabilize the government and its institutions.
They were also no doubt helped by the various other often successful revolutions in the regions such as those of the Khmer Rouge and the Viet Cong. They were though not to see the same success for various reasons.
However, the period of growth was not without its internal challenges. Ideological debates within the CPP and NPA about strategy and tactics led to internal purges, with accusations of “military adventurism” and deviations from Marxist-Leninist principles.
These purges were often brutal, leading to the execution of members accused of being government spies or betraying the movement. This internal strife weakened the NPA’s cohesion and led to significant losses in both personnel and morale.
The People Power Revolution and Aftermath
The 1986 People Power Revolution, which resulted in the ouster of Ferdinand Marcos and the restoration of democratic governance under President Corazon Aquino, significantly altered the NPA’s trajectory. Initially, the Aquino administration showed openness to peace talks, a gesture that was reciprocated by the NPA. However, these talks quickly broke down due to mutual distrust and the continuation of hostilities.
The new democratic space allowed for greater political engagement and the formation of legal leftist organizations, drawing some members away from the NPA. This period also saw a decline in the NPA’s activities, partly due to intensified military campaigns against them and internal ideological splits. Some factions within the NPA advocated for a shift towards political means and engagement in the legal democratic process, while others insisted on continuing the armed struggle.
Resurgence and Contemporary Issues
Despite setbacks, the NPA remains active in various parts of the Philippines, particularly in rural and mountainous regions. The group’s continued existence is fueled by enduring issues such as landlessness, poverty, and political corruption, which resonate with marginalized communities. The NPA has adapted to changing circumstances, using more sophisticated tactics and technology, including the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs).
The Philippine government has alternated between military offensives and attempts at peace negotiations, reflecting a complex and often contradictory approach to resolving the conflict. Under President Rodrigo Duterte, initial peace overtures were overshadowed by a renewed declaration of war against the NPA, as part of his broader campaign against various insurgent and terrorist groups.
The NPA’s funding has also been a topic of concern, with allegations of extortion, protection rackets, and “revolutionary taxes” imposed on businesses. These practices have further complicated the group’s relations with local communities and posed ethical questions within its ranks.
The Path Forward: Challenges and Prospects
The NPA’s future remains uncertain, with its ability to sustain itself increasingly challenged by both internal and external pressures. Internally, the NPA faces the constant challenge of maintaining discipline and cohesion among its members, who are often isolated in remote areas. Externally, the Philippine government continues its military campaigns, supported by international allies, including the United States.
Peace negotiations have periodically resumed, but a lasting solution remains elusive. Key issues such as political prisoners, economic reforms, and genuine land redistribution are central to any comprehensive peace agreement. The international community and various civil society groups have called for a renewed focus on dialogue and addressing the root causes of the insurgency.
Conclusion on the New Peoples Army
The history of the New People’s Army is a complex tapestry of struggle, ideology, and socio-political dynamics. As one of the longest-running insurgencies in the world, the NPA’s story is intertwined with the broader narrative of the Philippines’ quest for justice, equity, and national sovereignty. Understanding the NPA involves recognizing the deep-seated issues that continue to challenge the nation, including poverty, inequality, and governance.
As the Philippines moves forward, the legacy of the NPA and the broader communist movement will continue to be a significant factor in its political and social landscape. Whether through continued conflict or potential reconciliation, the issues raised by the NPA will remain central to the country’s future discourse and development.