The geopolitical landscape of South Asia has always been a complex chessboard, where internal politics often intersect with the strategic interests of external powers. Bangladesh, a nation with a tumultuous political history, has found itself at the center of these dynamics.
The recent turmoil surrounding Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh’s long-serving Prime Minister, has sparked questions about whether the West played a role in her potential overthrow. To understand the plausibility of such interference, it’s crucial to explore both the historical context and the patterns of Western intervention in the region.
The Historical Context: Western Interventions in South Asia
Western powers, particularly the United States and its allies, have a long history of intervening in South Asian politics. The Cold War era saw numerous instances where Western interests aligned with local elites to topple governments that were seen as too closely aligned with communist ideologies or regional adversaries. Two notable examples highlight this pattern: the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran in 1953 and the toppling of King Sihanouk in Cambodia in 1970.
Iran, 1953: Operation Ajax
The 1953 coup in Iran, orchestrated by the CIA and the British MI6, remains one of the most infamous examples of Western intervention. Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister, had nationalized the country’s oil industry, which had been under British control. This move threatened Western economic interests, particularly the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP). In response, the West orchestrated a coup that removed Mossadegh from power and reinstated the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was more amenable to Western interests .
This intervention not only set a precedent for Western involvement in the region but also left a lasting impact on Iran’s political landscape, sowing seeds of anti-Western sentiment that culminated in the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
Cambodia, 1970: The Overthrow of King Sihanouk
In Cambodia, the West’s involvement was driven by the larger context of the Vietnam War. King Norodom Sihanouk, who had maintained a neutral stance during the conflict, was overthrown in a coup led by General Lon Nol, who had the backing of the United States.
The coup destabilized Cambodia, leading to years of civil war and eventually paving the way for the rise of the Khmer Rouge, a radical communist regime responsible for one of the worst genocides of the 20th century .
These historical examples illustrate a clear pattern of Western intervention in South Asia, often justified by the need to protect strategic and economic interests. But does this pattern extend to Bangladesh and Sheikh Hasina?
To read about US support for the Khmer Rouge click here.
Sheikh Hasina’s Rise and Rule
Sheikh Hasina, the daughter of Bangladesh’s founding father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, has been a dominant figure in Bangladeshi politics for decades. First serving as Prime Minister from 1996 to 2001, she returned to power in 2009 and has since maintained a firm grip on the country’s political landscape. Under her leadership, Bangladesh has experienced significant economic growth and development, but her tenure has not been without controversy.
Critics accuse Hasina of authoritarianism, pointing to her government’s crackdown on political opposition, restrictions on free speech, and alleged manipulation of elections . The West, particularly the United States, has expressed concern over these developments, but until recently, Hasina managed to maintain a working relationship with Western powers, balancing Bangladesh’s relations with both the West and regional giants like India and China.
The Recent Turmoil: A Western Plot?
The question of whether the West played a role in destabilizing Sheikh Hasina’s government cannot be answered definitively without concrete evidence. However, certain developments raise suspicions. In recent years, Hasina’s increasingly close ties with China have raised eyebrows in Washington. Bangladesh’s participation in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), its purchase of Chinese military equipment, and growing economic ties with Beijing have led some analysts to speculate that the West might view Hasina as too closely aligned with China—a potential threat to Western interests in the region .
Moreover, the timing of the recent unrest in Bangladesh, coupled with reports of Western diplomats meeting with opposition leaders, has fueled speculation about external involvement. Similar patterns have been observed in other countries where the West has supported opposition movements to undermine governments deemed unfriendly to Western interests. For instance, the 2014 protests in Ukraine, which eventually led to the ousting of President Yanukovych, were marked by significant Western support for opposition groups, including financial aid and diplomatic backing .
In Bangladesh, while there is no direct evidence linking the West to any attempts to overthrow Hasina, the history of Western intervention in South Asia suggests that such a scenario is not beyond the realm of possibility. The West has a vested interest in ensuring that Bangladesh remains within its sphere of influence, particularly in light of the country’s strategic location and growing economic importance.
The Role of Regional Powers
In assessing the likelihood of Western involvement in any plot against Hasina, it is essential to consider the role of regional powers, particularly India and China. India, which shares a long and porous border with Bangladesh, has historically played a significant role in its neighbor’s politics. The relationship between India and Bangladesh has been complex, characterized by cooperation and occasional tensions. India has generally supported Hasina’s government, viewing her as a reliable partner in maintaining regional stability and countering Islamist extremism .
China, on the other hand, has emerged as a key player in Bangladesh’s economic development, investing heavily in infrastructure projects and providing military assistance. This growing relationship has caused concern in New Delhi, which views China’s presence in South Asia as part of a broader strategy to encircle India. Any Western effort to destabilize Hasina would likely have to take into account the reactions of both India and China, making such an intervention a highly delicate operation.
The Future of Bangladesh’s Political Landscape
As Bangladesh approaches its next election, the political landscape remains uncertain. Sheikh Hasina has shown resilience in the face of challenges, but the opposition, buoyed by growing discontent and potential external support, poses a significant threat. Whether the West is involved in this dynamic remains speculative, but the historical pattern of intervention in the region cannot be ignored.
Bangladesh’s future will likely depend on how well Hasina navigates the complex web of domestic politics and international relations. If she can maintain a balance between her relationships with China, India, and the West, she may well continue to lead the country. However, any perceived tilt towards China could prompt a stronger response from the West, potentially leading to further instability .
Conclusion: A Question of Influence
The question of whether the West is behind any effort to overthrow Sheikh Hasina remains unanswered. What is clear, however, is that Bangladesh’s political landscape is deeply influenced by the strategic interests of external powers. The history of Western intervention in South Asia suggests that the possibility cannot be dismissed outright, especially in a region where the stakes are so high.
As Bangladesh moves forward, its leaders will need to carefully manage their relationships with both regional and global powers to ensure the country’s stability and continued development. Whether Sheikh Hasina remains at the helm or not, the influence of the West—and indeed, of other powers—will continue to shape the future of Bangladesh.
Citations:
- CIA and MI6 Operation Ajax (Wikipedia)
- Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (Britannica)
- Cambodian Coup of 1970 (Britannica)
- Bangladesh’s Belt and Road Involvement (Reuters)
- Western Diplomacy in Bangladesh (Reuters)
- India’s Influence in Bangladesh (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
—————————————————————-
To read about DPR Korea tourism click here.